With the
possibility of Turkey and Malaysia the top body will for the first time in its
history have a record four countries with Muslim majority populations
Jakarta Globe – AFP, Oct 13, 2014
United
Nations. Years of campaigning for a seat at the world’s “top table” come to a
head this week when elections are held to the UN Security Council, which
decides on such weighty matters as sanctions, war and peace.
Five seats
are up for grabs in the 15-member Council, where the elected countries will
join the five permanent powers — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United
States — for a two-year stint.
For the
contenders, a Council seat is the ultimate diplomatic prize, raising a
country’s profile several notches, boosting influence and providing knockoff
benefits in bilateral ties.
Governments
spend years lobbying for support with slick campaigns designed to appeal to key
constituencies from the 193-nation General Assembly, which will cast ballots on
Thursday to fill the five seats.
In this
round, three of the five seats are all but decided after regional groups put
forward their candidates, even though these countries still need to secure two
thirds of the votes from the Assembly.
These will
likely go to Angola, chosen by African nations, which will be making its debut
at the Council; Venezuela, put forward by Latin American and Caribbean states;
and Malaysia, picked by Asian countries.
The three
are expected to take up the seats vacated by Argentina, Rwanda and South Korea.
For the
remaining two seats, three countries are in the running — Spain, Turkey and New
Zealand — in a race that is shaping up as too close to call.
The two
elected countries will replace Australia and Luxembourg. The five other seats
held by Chad, Chile, Jordan, Lithuania and Nigeria will come up for election
next year.
With the
possible entry of Turkey and Malaysia, joining Chad and Jordan already on the
Council, the top body will for the first time in its history have a record of
four Muslim countries at the table.
Worried
about Venezuela
Much
attention has focused on Venezuela’s likely entry to the Council, and the
appointment of late president Hugo Chavez’s equally fiery daughter, Maria
Gabriela, as deputy ambassador to the United Nations.
Human
Rights Watch’s UN director Philippe Bolopion said Venezuela’s record of voting
at the UN Human Rights Council gave cause for worry that the leftist regime
will be “on the wrong side” of rights issues.
“Without
question, they had one of the worst voting records. They were opposed to very
important resolutions on Sri Lanka, Iran, Belarus,” said Bolopion.
Geneva-based
UN Watch director Hillel Neuer likened electing Venezuela to the Council to
“making a pyromaniac into the fire chief,” pointing to its support for Syria’s
Bashar al-Assad among other pariahs.
Turkey’s
possible entry is stirring debate over whether the NATO member and fierce
opponent of Assad could help address crises in Syria, Iraq and the ever-thorny
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
One
European diplomat said the round of elections will produce a “more difficult
Council to work with” at a time when the world body is confronting multiple
crises, from the jihadist offensive in Iraq and Syria to the Ebola outbreak in
West Africa.
Others,
however, caution that the Council’s agenda is still very much in the hands of
the so-called P5 and that divisions over Syria, eastern Ukraine and the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict will remain unchanged.
One of the
most divisive issues remains Syria, where Russia has steadfastly opposed
resolutions condemning the Assad regime, although it backed a measure on
allowing UN humanitarian aid deliveries without Damascus’s consent.
Bolopion
singled out Australia and Luxembourg — both outgoing non-permanent members — as
strong voices that helped break down divisions among the big powers on Syria
and paved the way for the adoption of the humanitarian aid resolution.
Global
power
As the most
powerful body of the United Nations, the Security Council can impose sanctions
on countries and individuals, refer suspects for war crimes prosecution,
endorse peace accords and authorize the use of force.
It also
oversees 16 peacekeeping missions in the world, with a budget of close to $8
billion.
New
Zealand’s former UN ambassador Colin Keating made the case bluntly that a seat
on the Council generates payoffs for medium and small powers, not just in terms
of prestige.
“You are
seen sitting at the top table. The influence that that carries can be very
significant when exporters need help,” he said.
“When you
want to raise something bilaterally, you get taken much more seriously. You get
unparalleled political access.”
Thursday’s
vote is carried out at the General Assembly by secret ballot and involves
several rounds of voting with the five new members set to take up their seats
on Jan. 1.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.