Yahoo – AFP,
Chantal Valery, 13 Sep 2014
Washington (AFP) - The US Supreme Court this week made plans to revisit gay marriage, less than 15 months after its landmark decision that same-sex couples were entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals.
![]() |
Demonstrators
in support of same sex marriage stand in front of the US Supreme Court
in
Washington, DC during the second annual "March for Marriage" June 19,
2014
(AFP Photo/Karen Bleier)
|
Washington (AFP) - The US Supreme Court this week made plans to revisit gay marriage, less than 15 months after its landmark decision that same-sex couples were entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals.
While
courts across the United States have been hearing gay-marriage cases, the
Supreme Court said it will use a September 29 private conference to consider
appeals that concern whether gay marriage can be legal in some states but not
in others.
![]() |
Same-sex
couples line up to get marriage
licenses at the Oakland County Courthouse
on March 22, 2014 in Pontiac, Michigan
(AFP Photo/Bill Pugliano)
|
Whether for
or against gay marriage, concerned US parties seem to be forming a consensus on
at least one point: it's time for the Supreme Court to decide.
"It's
crystal-clear that the court needs to take up the freedom to marry issue
again," said James Esseks, from the American Civil Liberties Union.
On June 26,
2013, the Supreme Court made history by invalidating parts of the Defense of
Marriage Act, which restricted marriage to heterosexual couples.
As a
result, the federal government was allowed to recognize same-sex couples in all
federal matters, such as sharing pension benefits.
But the
nine justices left it to each state to decide whether to legalize gay marriage.
To date, 19 of the 50 US states, plus the capital Washington, have legalized
the practice.
Awaiting
'further court action'
But can a
state explicitly prohibit gay marriage, as 31 have done?
In Utah and
Virginia, where lower courts have struck down the state bans, the Supreme Court
has blocked couples from marrying as it weighs whether to legalize the unions
nationwide.
That means
"same-sex couples and their families await further court action for full
vindication," said Elizabeth Wydra, a lawyer with the Constitutional
Accountability Center (CAC).
But, said
David Cruz, a law professor at the University of Southern California, "if
the Court were simply to deny review in all these cases, then the stays would
be lifted and tens of millions of people would then be living in marriage
equality states."
![]() |
An opponent
of same-sex marriage protests
outside the Walter E. Hoffman US Courthouse
on
February 4, 2014 in Norfolk, Virginia (AFP
Photo/Jay Paul)
|
The high
court could say as soon as September 30 -- one day after the justices' private
conference -- whether it will take up any of the cases from the five states and
make a ruling in June 2015.
But the
justices could also hold of weighing in, waiting to see if a federal appeals
court somewhere rules gay marriage bans are legal.
"The
justices have more difficulty denying a certiorari petition (to come before the
Supreme Court) when the appellate courts disagree, because that means there
would be different legal rules governing marriage equality in different regions
of the US," Carl Tobias, law professor at the University of Richmond told
AFP.
But Cruz
said he doesn't believe the top court will wait.
"It
seems increasingly unlikely that the Justices on the court would let so many
pages of history be written without their input."
Related Article:



No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.