(Reuters) -
Executives from U.S. credit rating agencies are expected to face sharp
congressional scrutiny on Wednesday for their companies' roles in the financial
crisis and the U.S. debt ceiling debate.
Deven
Sharma, president of McGraw-Hill Cos Inc unit Standard & Poor's, and
Michael Rowan, global managing director for the commercial group at Moody's
Corp's Moody's Investors Service, are due to appear before the House Financial Services
subcommittee.
The hearing
was originally scheduled to analyze whether the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial
oversight law had succeeded in reducing investors' blind reliance on rating
agencies.
Such
companies have been blamed for helping to fuel the financial crisis by
assigning top ratings to securities that were backed by subprime mortgages,
which then plummeted in value as the housing market collapsed.
But, it is
the companies' front-and-center role in the deficit debate that is now expected
to draw the most heat.
The
agencies have been criticized for issuing ratings and warnings that negatively
reflect on countries in the throes of sensitive negotiations regarding
sovereign debt, including Greece and the United States.
"The
debt ceiling negotiations and the long-term fiscal health of the U.S. have
brought a renewed focus on the credit rating agencies," Randy Neugebauer,
chairman of the oversight subcommittee, said in a statement on Tuesday.
U.S.
lawmakers are trying to reach a deal by August 2 to raise the $14.3 trillion
U.S. debt limit and avoid a credit default.
WHOSE
CREDIBILITY IS AT STAKE?
Rating
agencies have warned that the United States needs to come up with a credible
deficit-reduction plan to keep its triple-A rating in the long term. S&P
has threatened to downgrade the country in the next three months in the absence
of such a plan.
In prepared
testimony released on Tuesday and due to be delivered on Wednesday, Sharma and
Rowan said their companies were embracing Dodd-Frank reforms, including
dropping credit ratings from information used by government agencies when
judging the riskiness of a company.
A
Republican aide said lawmakers would press regulators and rating agency
executives on whether Dodd-Frank perpetuates the market power of the Big Three
rating agencies -- S&P, Moody's and Fimalac SA's Fitch Ratings.
Republicans
will question whether the cost to rating agencies to comply with new
regulations is so high that it stifles competition, the aide said.
In the
testimony, Sharma warned against over-regulation by the government that would
push the companies into using a common rating methodology rather than
individual methods to arrive at ratings. He said such an approach would
compromise their independence.
"In a
global economy where we rate more than 120 sovereign governments, it is
particularly important that rating methodologies not become subject to
influence by one or more countries seeking to benefit its own rating, which
would undermine the independence, comparability and value of ratings to
all," Sharma said.
(Reporting
by Karey Wutkowski and Sarah N. Lynch in Washington and Daniel Bases in New
York; Editing by Andrea Ricci, Gary Crosse; Toni Reinhold)
Related Articles:
![]() |
EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding
says rating agencies are too dominant |
Moody's may cut Portugal on growth, debt concerns (Dec 21, 2010)
Moody's slashes Ireland to Baa1, warns more may be ahead (Dec 17, 2010)
Moody's may cut Greek credit rating, puts on review (Dec 16, 2010)
Moody's warns it may downgrade Spain's debt (Dec 15, 2010)
Moody’s Threatens Credit Downgrades for Belgium, U.S. (Dec 14, 2010)

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.